— Mystery & Crime —

Strangers on a Train
Patricia Highsmith
— 1950 —
“
Two strangers on a train propose a "perfect" murder exchange.
Decide its fate
⚖The case for it
Nothing Bruno does to Guy ever looks like force. He simply keeps appearing, keeps talking, until his logic has moved into Guy's head and set up house. The premise is a swapped-murder pact between strangers, but Highsmith is after something quieter and worse: a decent man colonized by another's will, guilt clinging to people who only stood nearby. The back half leans on a dogged detective and bleeds off some of that early pressure. Even so, the disease she would study for a whole career is already alive here, and the opening risks what most thrillers never touch.
— the honest librarian
✕The case against
Guy's surrender to Bruno requires him to behave like a sleepwalker for a hundred pages, and patience frays long before the tension finally breaks. Once it does, the book hands itself to a private detective and deflates. Anne is a mannequin of wifely goodness. Highsmith got better; this is the rough draft of her talent.
— the honest librarian
beyond the verdict
if you loved this, read these →





