— Mystery & Crime —

The Secret History
Donna Tartt
— 1992 —
“
Whatever else you read on its subject is a footnote to this.
Decide its fate
⚖The case for it
Richard barely exists: he is a hunger with a narrator's job, an outsider so desperate to belong that he mostly stands at the window of other people's lives. Read that as the flaw and you miss the design. His emptiness is the lens; the group's glamour only registers because someone that starved is doing the looking, and his willingness to lie for beauty is the book's real crime. Tartt knows exactly why she gave the murder away on page one: the suspense was never who, only how far a person will follow the people he wants to be. Stay for that.
— the honest librarian
✕The case against
Richard, the narrator, is a watcher with almost no inner life of his own, which leaves him reporting on more interesting people without quite joining them. After Bunny goes off the cliff, the back half slows to a long crawl of guilt and unraveling that runs well past its natural length. The Greek-and-beauty worship can read as a clever student showing off the reading list.
— the honest librarian
beyond the verdict
if you loved this, read these →





